MANAGEMENT OF A SUPPLY CHAIN

专利摘要:
The logistics data includes a plurality of shipments, each comprising deliveries related to an item of the purchase order line (POLI). Each of the deliveries has a delivery quantity and a goods issue date (PGI). Logistics data also includes a plurality of logistic services for the plurality of shipments including deliveries related to the POLI. A multi-mode send includes a plurality of sequential logistic services. The logistics data includes a plurality of deliveries related to the POLI, in which a quantity of goods received (GR) and a date GR are determined for each delivery. The processor allows display of the PGI date and GR date for multi-mode sending. The processor calculates the received merchandise date (GR) for a PO item (POLI) based on the multiple POLI related shipments and POLI related multiple GRs entered in a location field.
公开号:FR3027708A1
申请号:FR1560076
申请日:2015-10-22
公开日:2016-04-29
发明作者:James Alan Bielefeldt；Dhirendra Diwan；Timonthy L Horvath；John Joseph Vogt
申请人:Halliburton Energy Services Inc；
IPC主号:

专利说明:

[0001] BACKGROUND [0001] Large companies with a global presence acquire products and equipment from different sources and send them to their final destinations around the world. Tracking these products and equipment from the point of purchase to end use is a challenge.
[0002] Presentation of this presentation A method according to one or more embodiments comprises: a processor calculating the date of goods received (GR) for an article of the purchase order line (POLI) based on the multiple mailings related to the POLI and the multiple GRs linked to the POLI entered in a location field.
[0003] A method according to one or more embodiments includes: identifying multiple deliveries related to an item in the purchase order line (POLI), each of multiple deliveries having a delivery quantity and an exit date of Merchandise (PGI), each PGI date being the date that the goods for the respective delivery were physically moved from a warehouse to a factory, the PGI dates having an order; identifying multiple shipments each related to a delivery, wherein each of the multiple shipments has a shipment quantity; identifying multiple received goods events (GRs) for the multiple deliveries related to the POLI, wherein each of the multiple GR events has a GR amount and a GR date, and the GR dates have an order; identification of a quantity required for the POLI; a processor calculating a GR network Date 1 by: matching the delivery quantities linked to a POLI to the quantities GR of the multiple GR events related to the POLI, wherein the correspondence is ambiguous because at least a portion of the delivery quantities related to the POLI is equal and at least a part of the GR quantities related to the POLI is equal, the resolution of this ambiguity giving preference to the alignment of the order of the PGI dates with respect to the GR order of dates, for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, and the GR date for each correspondence in the GR network Date I the processor calculating a GR Date 2 network by: totaling the delivery quantities of the deliveries related to the same consignment, matching the totalized delivery quantities to the GR quantities, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery date, GR quantity and GR date for the GR network Date 2 the processor calculating a GR Date 3 network by: totaling the GR quantities of a GR event group so that the sum corresponds to a delivery quantity of one of the multiple deliveries, determining a maximum of the GR dates from the GR event group and saving it as a maximum GR date 3, changing the GR dates of the GR events in the group for maximum GR date 3 , and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR Date 3 network; the processor calculating a GR Date 4 network by: totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities; determine that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, determine a maximum of the GR dates from the multiple GR events and record it as a maximum GR date 4, change the GR dates of the multiple GR events for the maximum GR date 4, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 4; for each shipment, determination of an ATA date as the actual time of arrival of the cargo. the determination that the following condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 1> ATA GR date and date GR Date 1> PGI Date); the determination that the following condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 2> ATA GR date and date GR Date 2> PGI Date); the determination that the following condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 3> ATA GR date and date GR Date 3> PGI Date); the determination that the following condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: il) (GR date of GR Date 4> ATA GR date and date GR Date 4> PGI Date); and the determination, therefore, that the purchase order is still open. A method according to one or more embodiments comprises: identifying multiple deliveries related to an item of the purchase order line (POLI), wherein each of the multiple deliveries has a delivery quantity and a date Goods Issue Date (PGI), each PGI date being the date on which the goods for the respective delivery were physically moved from a warehouse to a factory, the PGI dates having an order; identifying multiple shipments each related to a delivery, wherein each of the multiple shipments has a shipment quantity; Identifying multiple received goods events (GRs) for multiple deliveries related to the POLI, wherein each of the multiple GR events has a GR amount and a GR date, and the GR dates have an order; identification of a quantity required for the POLI; a processor calculating a GR Date 1 network by: 25 matching POLI related delivery quantities to the GR quantities of the multiple GR events related to the POLI, wherein the match is ambiguous because at least a portion of the related delivery quantities at the POLI is equal and at least a portion of the quantities GR related to the POLI is equal, the resolution of this ambiguity giving preference to the alignment of the order of the dates of PGI with respect to the order of the dates GR, for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, and the GR date in the GR network Date I the processor calculating a GR Date 2 network by: totaling the delivery quantities of the related deliveries the same consignment, matching the totalized delivery quantities to the GR quantities, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the quantity GR and the date GR for the GR network Date 2 the processor calculating a GR network Date 3 by: totaling the quantities GR of a group of events GR so that the sum corresponds to a delivery quantity of one multiple deliveries, determining a maximum of the GR dates from the GR event group and saving it as a maximum GR date 3, changing the GR dates of the GR events in the group for maximum GR date 3, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR Date 3 network; the processor calculating a GR Date 4 network by: totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities; determine that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, determine a maximum of the GR dates from the multiple GR events and record it as a maximum GR date 4, change the GR dates of the multiple GR events for the maximum GR date 4, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 4; for each shipment, determination of an ATA date as the actual time of arrival of the cargo; Determination that the following GRDATE1 condition is true for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date GR Date 1> ATA GR date and date GR Date 1> PGI Date); and defining a date GR for each of the at least one delivery for which the GRDATE1 condition is true with respect to the respective GR date for delivery in the GR network Date 1. A method according to one or more modes (s) ) includes: the identification of multiple delivery items related to an item in the purchase order line (POLI), each of multiple delivery items having an item delivery quantity and a goods issue date ( PGI), with each PGI date being the date on which the goods for the respective delivery item were physically moved from a warehouse or plant, the PGI dates having an order; identification of multiple shipments, in which each of the multiple shipments has a shipment quantity, in which each shipment is linked to a delivery, each delivery is linked to a delivery item, and at least one of the deliveries is linked to a shipment; plurality of delivery items; identifying multiple received goods events (GRs) for the multiple delivery items related to the POLI, wherein each of the multiple GR events has a GR amount and a GR date, and the GR dates have an order; identification of a quantity required for the POLI; a processor calculating a GR Date 1 network by: matching POLI delivery item quantities to GR quantities of the multiple GR events related to the POLI, where the match is ambiguous because at least a portion of the article quantities POLI-related delivery is equal and at least a portion of the GR quantities related to the POLI is equal, resolving this ambiguity by giving preference to aligning the order of the PGI dates with the ordering of the GR dates, and for each delivery item, the record of the delivery item quantity, the PGI date for the delivery item quantity, and the GR date for each correspondence in the GR network Date 1; the processor calculating a GR Date 2 network by: totaling the delivery article quantities of the delivery items related to the same consignment, matching the totalised delivery article quantities with the GR quantities, and for each delivery, the registration of the totalized delivery item quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the GR quantity, and the GR date for the GR Date 2 network; the processor calculating a GR Date 3 network by: totaling the quantities GR of a group of events GR so that the sum corresponds to a quantity of delivery item of one of the multiple deliveries, determining a maximum of the dates GR from the GR event group and saving it as a maximum GR date 3, changing the GR dates of the GR events in the group for maximum GR date 3, and for each delivery, recording the amount of delivery item, the PGI date for the delivery item quantity, the totalized GR quantity, and the GR date changed in the GR Date 3 network; the processor calculating a GR Date 4 network by: totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities; determine that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, determine a maximum of the GR dates from the multiple GR events and record it as a maximum GR date 4, change the GR dates of the multiple GR events to the maximum GR date 4, for each delivery item, record the delivery item quantity, the PGI date for the delivery item quantity, the totalized GR quantity, and the GR date changed in the GR Date 4 network; for each shipment, determination of an ATA date as the actual time of arrival of the cargo; determine that the following GRDATE1 condition is not true for at least one of the delivery items: (GR date of GR Date 1> ATA GR date and date GR Date 1> PGI Date); determine that the following GRDATE2 condition is true for at least one of the deliveries (date GR GR Date 2> ATA Date and date GR of GR Date 2> PGI Date); and the definition of the GR date for each of the deliveries for which the GRDATE2 condition is true for the respective GR date in the GR network Date 2. A method according to one or more embodiments comprises: identification of multiple deliveries linked to an item in the purchase order line (POLI), in which each of the multiple deliveries has a delivery quantity and a goods issue date (PGI), each PGI date being the date on which the goods for delivery were physically moved from a warehouse to a factory, with PGI dates having an order; identifying multiple shipments each linked to a delivery, where each of the multiple shipments has a shipment quantity; identifying multiple received goods events (GRs) for the multiple deliveries related to the POLI, wherein each of the multiple GR events has a GR amount and a GR date, and the GR dates have an order; identification of a quantity required for the POLI; a processor calculating a GR network Date 1 by: matching the delivery quantities linked to a POLI to the quantities GR of the multiple GR events related to the POLI, wherein the correspondence is ambiguous because at least a portion of the delivery quantities related to the POLI is equal and at least a portion of the quantities GR related to the POLI is equal, the resolution of this ambiguity giving preference to the alignment of the order of the PGI dates to the order of the dates of GR, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI of the delivery quantity, the quantity GR, and the GR for each correspondence in the GR network Date 1; the processor calculating a GR Date 2 network by: totaling the delivery quantities of the deliveries related to the same shipment, matching the totalized delivery quantities to the GR quantities, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the quantity GR and the date GR for the network GR Date 2 the processor calculating a network GR Date 3 by: totaling the quantities GR of a group of events GR so that the sum corresponds to a quantity delivery of one of the multiple deliveries, determining a maximum of the GR dates from the GR event group and saving it as a maximum GR date 3, changing the GR dates of the GR events in the group for maximum GR date 3, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 3; the processor calculating a GR Date 4 network by: totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities; 20 determine that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, determine a maximum of the GR dates from the multiple GR events and record it as a maximum GR date 4, change the GR dates of the multiple GR events for the GR maximum date 4, 25 and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 4; for each shipment, determination of a date ATA as the actual time of arrival of the cargo; determining that the following GRDATE1 condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date GR Date 1> ATA GR date and date GR Date 1> PGI Date); the determination that the following GRDATE2 condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 2> ATA GR date and date GR Date 2> PGI Date); the determination that the following GRDAIE3 condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 3> ATA Date and GR date of GR Date 3> PGI Date); and defining a date GR for each of the at least one delivery for which the GRDATE3 condition is true for the respective GR date for delivery in the GR network Date 3. A method according to one or more embodiment (s) comprises: the identification of multiple deliveries related to an item in the purchase order line (POLI), in which each of the multiple deliveries has a delivery quantity and a goods issue date (PGI), each PGI date being the date on which which the goods for the respective delivery were physically moved from a warehouse to a factory, the PGI dates having an order; identifying multiple shipments each linked to a delivery, where each of the multiple shipments has a shipment quantity; identifying multiple received goods events (GRs) for the multiple deliveries related to the POLI, wherein each of the multiple GR events has a GR amount and a GR date, and the GR dates have an order; identification of a quantity required for the POLI; a processor calculating a GR network Date 1 by: matching the delivery quantities linked to a POLI to the quantities GR of the multiple GR events related to the POLI, wherein the correspondence is ambiguous because at least a portion of the delivery quantities related to the POLI is equal and at least a portion of the quantities GR related to the POLI is equal, the resolution of this ambiguity giving preference to the alignment of the order of dates of PGI to the order of the dates of GR, and for each delivery, registration of the delivery quantity, the PGI of the delivery quantity, the quantity GR, and the GR for each correspondence in the GR network Date I; the processor calculating a GR Date 2 network by: totaling the delivery quantities of the deliveries related to the same shipment, matching the totalized delivery quantities to the GR quantities, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the quantity GR and the date GR for the network GR Date 2 the processor calculating a network GR Date 3 by: totaling the quantities GR of a group of events GR so that the sum corresponds to a quantity delivery of one of the multiple deliveries, determining a maximum of the GR dates from the GR event group and saving it as a maximum GR date 3, changing the GR dates of the GR events in the group for maximum GR date 3, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 3; the processor calculating a GR Date 4 network by: totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities; determine that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, determine a maximum of the GR dates from the multiple GR events and record it as a maximum GR date 4, change the GR dates of the multiple GR events for the maximum GR date 4, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 4; for each shipment, determination of an ATA date as the actual time of arrival of the cargo; determining that the following GRDATE1 condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date GR Date 1> ATA GR date and date GR Date 1> PGI Date); the determination that the following GRDATE2 condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 2> ATA GR date and date GR Date 2> PGI Date); the determination that the following GRDATE3 condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 3> ATA Date and GR date of GR Date 3> PGI Date); determining that the following GRDATE4 condition is true for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 4> ATA GR date and date GR Date 4> PGI Date); and the definition of the date GR for each of the at least one delivery for which the GRDATE4 condition is true for the respective GR date for delivery in the GR network Date 4. A method according to one or more embodiment (s) includes: a processor receiving and storing logistic data relating to an item of the purchase order line (POLI), the logistics data comprising: a plurality of items, each item comprising deliveries related to an item of the coupon line; Order (POLI), in which each delivery includes: a quantity of the delivery, and a date of goods issue (PGI); a plurality of logistic services for the plurality of shipments including deliveries related to the POLI, one of the plurality of shipments, a multi-mode shipment, having a plurality of sequential logistic services; a plurality of deliveries related to the POLI, in which the following elements are determined for each of the deliveries: a quantity of goods received (GR), and a date GR; the processor for displaying the date PGI and the date GR for multimode sending having a plurality of modes of transport. In one or more embodiments, the processor receiving and storing logistics data relating to the POLI includes receiving data from logistics data providers selected from the group consisting of freight forwarders and customs brokers. In one or more embodiments, the plurality of sequential logistics services comprises: a first mode of transport operated by a first provider, the first provider carrying the multi-mode transmission from a first location to a second location; and a second mode of transport operated by a second supplier different from the first provider, the second provider carrying the multi-mode shipment from a second location to a third location; and In one or more embodiments, the determination of the date GR for each of the deliveries includes: the processor calculating the GR dates for deliveries related to the multi-mode shipment based on the plurality of deliveries related to the POLI . In one or more embodiments, the plurality of sequential logistics services include: a service provided by a forwarding company; a service provided by a courier company; and a service provided by a customs broker logistics. In one or more embodiments, the plurality of sequential logistics services is selected from a group consisting of a service provided by a cargo handling company, a service provided by a courier company and a service provided by a service provider. customs broker logistics. Brief Description of the Figures [0002] FIG. 1 is an illustration of a supply chain. [0003] Figs. 2A-2C represent a flowchart of a supply chain visualization application. [0004] Figs. 2D-2H is an illustration of the data flow associated with the supply chain visualization application. [0005] FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an SAP® connector. [0006] FIG. 4 is a screenshot used to enter data on the portal of an additional event. [0007] Figs. 5, 6, and 8-13 are relationship diagrams illustrating the relationships between files in the supply chain visualization application. [0008] Figs. 7A-7D are flow diagrams illustrating the processing of the received goods data. [0009] FIG. 14 is a screenshot of an application presenting the visualization. [0010] FIG. 15 is a screenshot of a search screen. [0011] FIG. Figure 16 shows the column headers for a screen of all the commands. [0012] FIG. Figure 17 illustrates the column headers for a screen of all orders (logistic summary). [0013] FIG. 18 is a screenshot of a tracking page of a shipment. [0014] FIG. 19 is a screenshot of a statistical tool of a logistics network. [0015] FIG. 20 is a screen shot of a notification tool of an order cancellation.
[0004] DETAILED DESCRIPTION [0016] For the purpose of this document, a "delivery" or "outbound delivery" is defined as an SAP® document (SAP Aktiengesellschaft Corporation of Dietmar-Hopp-Allee, Germany) which authorizes the release of goods and services. 'a quantity of the inventory. The delivery is then assigned to a shipment (defined below) representing the goods to be delivered together to the recipient of the goods. The document includes: - the number of the goods, - the quantity of the delivery, - the indications on the location (that is to say, the place of receipt of the goods, the place of discharge), - the weights and volumes of the individual products. As part of this document, a "goods issue date" (or "PGI date") is affixed to a delivery and represents the date on which the goods are physically moved from a warehouse or factory. when a shipment shipment is completed. When the goods are goods for an outbound delivery, the stock of a warehouse containing the product is reduced by the quantity delivered. As part of this document, a "shipment" is defined as the transport of goods from a shipper to a recipient, according to the agreed conditions. Transport planning, receiving address, trip, shipping costs, etc., are defined in the shipping documents. A shipment can consist of a set of deliveries with the same journey. Shipments made as part of the mailing process or the send feature are referred to as the "strategic network". Deliveries that do not have a send feature are called a "non-strategic network". As part of this document, a "purchase order" (or "BO") is defined as a request or an instruction from a purchasing agency for a supplier or a factory to provide or offer a certain quantity of goods or services at a given time or within a certain period of time. A purchase order consists of a document header and one or more items, (or "purchase order item lines" or "POLI"). In one or more embodiments, as illustrated in FIG. 1, a supply chain visualization application 102 includes a software application that enables international tracking of open orders for products and equipment across a supply chain, typically identified by an arrow 104, of the manufacturer / repair center, the address of the seller or the address of the warehouse until the delivery and receipt of goods (GR) to the final destination. It will be understood that FIG. 1 is an illustrative example which is not intended to limit the scope of the claims. In one or more embodiments, the supply chain visualization application 102 includes four portals through which data may be inputted - a computerized data exchange interface (DDI) 106, which is a computerized interface through which data from freight forwarders (that is, transport companies that transport freight from one location to another) and customs brokers (ie , people or offices that facilitate the import and export of goods across political boundaries) can be entered into the supply chain visualization application 102, in which, in one or more embodiments , they are stored in a SAPe product management system provided by SAP Aktiengesellschaft Corporation of Dietmar-Hopp-Allee Germany through a structured query language (SQL) interface to a server r SQL in the SAPe; - an interface of the monthly forwarding and brokerage files (FF BIVII) 108, through which freight forwarders and customs brokers provide monthly reports containing event data that are uploaded to the SQL server; - a manual event portal (MEP) interface 110, which is an Internet portal that allows freight forwarders and customs brokers to record events; an additional event portal interface (AEP) 112, which is used by employees of a company 114 to enter shipping information or imputed invoice movements that have not been converted to strategic shipments ( that is, non-EDI movements) and to record event information in a standard format. In one or more embodiments, as shown in FIG. 1, the supply chain includes a company 114, which coordinates the activities of the supply chain. In one or more embodiments, the enterprise 114 acquires products and equipment from one or more manufacturing or repair centers 116, one or more suppliers 118 and / or one or more locations. in the field 120, to fill a POLI. In one or more embodiments, the purchase order that includes the POLI includes other purchase order line items. In one or more embodiments, one or more manufacturing or repair centers 116 respond with one or more shipments by one or more trucks operated by one or more forwarders 122. It will be understood that each of the forwarders described here can operate by air, sea, rail, truck or by charter or by any combination of these modes of transport. In one or more embodiments, one or more forwarders 122 communicate with the supply chain visualization application via the IDE, as indicated by the lightning flash 124 (which corresponds to the lightning flash at above the EDI of Fig. 1). In one or more embodiments, one or more suppliers 118 respond to one or more shipments by one or more different modes (air / ocean / rail / ground) operated by one or more forwarders 126. In a or more embodiments, one or more forwarders 126 provide monthly reports containing event data that are uploaded to the supply chain visualization application through the SQL server, as indicated by the file folder symbol 128 (which corresponds to the file folder symbol above the BMF FF in Fig. 1). In one or more embodiments, the locations in the field 120 respond with one or more shipments by one or more different modes (air / ocean / rail / land) operated by one or more forwarders 130. In one or more Embodiments, one or more forwarders 130 submit events to the supply chain viewing application through the MEP, as indicated by the keyboard symbol (which corresponds to the keyboard symbol above) MEP in Fig. 1). In one or more embodiments, the enterprise 114 receives the shipments from one or more manufacturing or repair centers 116, the one or more suppliers 118 and / or one or more locations on field 120. [0027] In one or more embodiments, the company 114 divides the received items into multiple consolidated items. In one or more embodiments, the company 114 sends one or more shipments by a plurality of different modes (air / ocean / rail / land) operated by one or more forwarders 134, which record the events with the EDI supply chain visualization application, as indicated by lightning 136. [0029] In one or more embodiments, the company 114 dispatches one or more shipments by one of several different modes (air / ocean / rail / ground) operated by one or more forwarders 138, which record events with the supply chain visualization application by FF BMF, as indicated by the folder symbol In one or more embodiments, the company 114 ships one or more shipments by one or more different modes (air / ocean / rail / land) operated by one or more forwarders 142, which record events With the MEP supply chain visualization application, as indicated by the keyboard symbol 144. In one or more embodiments, the forwarder 142 sends the load to an agent of the port 146 in a port. . In one or more embodiments, the port agent records events with the supply chain visualization application by the IDE, as indicated by lightning 148. In one or more embodiments , the port agent 146 sends the load by one of several different modes (air / ocean / rail / land) operated by one or more forwarders 150, which record the events with the supply chain visualization application by the EDI, as indicated by lightning 152. [0031] In one or more embodiments, the shipments shipped by the forwarder 134, the shipments shipped by the forwarder 138, and the shipments shipped by the forwarder 150 arrive at A final destination 154. In one or more embodiments, the final destination 154 records events with the EDI supply chain visualization application, as indicated in FIG. In one or more embodiments, the loads sent by the forwarder 134 are stored at the final destination 154. In one or more embodiments, the shipments sent by the forwarder 138 are stored at the final destination. 154. In one or more embodiments, the shipments sent by the forwarder 152 are stored at the final destination 154 In one or more embodiments, the final destination 154 withdraws products and uses them in quantities that do not correspond to the quantities in the cargoes, as it is presented in detail in connection with FIGS. 7A-7D and Scenarios 1-5. In one or more embodiments, shipments from the company 114 are not all shipped the same day. In one or more embodiments, the dates at which the shipments are delivered to the final destination 154 are not all the same. In one or more embodiments, some but not all dates are the same. In one or more embodiments, the plurality of forwarders 122, 126, 130, 134, 138, 142 and 152, and the port agent 146 enter the following information into the display application of the channel. supply for each shipment: - ETD date - the estimated date the consignment will be shipped from the country of origin, - ATD date - the actual date the consignment is shipped from the country of origin, - ETA date - the estimated date when the shipment will arrive in the country of final destination. - ATA date - the actual date the shipment arrived in the country of the final destination. In one or more embodiments, a shipment may pass through an intermediate country (i.e., by transhipment) (e.g., the port served by the port agent 146) on the way. to the country of the final destination. For example, in one or more embodiments, a shipment may go from Malaysia through Singapore on the way to Saudi Arabia. In one or more embodiments, even after arrival in the country of the final destination, a consignment may be processed by the customs bureaucracy of the country of final destination and may not be released from customs in its entirety, but may be separated into smaller packages. As can be seen, the single POLI can have multiple loads through the forwarders 134, 138, 142 and 152 and multiple delivery dates. It will be understood that the number of loads, the number of forwarders and the number of delivery dates may be greater or less than that indicated in FIG. 1. It will also be understood that FIG. 1 is just an example of a supply chain. Many variations of the illustrated example are contemplated. In one or more embodiments, illustrated in Figs. 2A, 2B, and 2C (which are arranged as shown in the key of Fig. 2C), the events entered through EDI 106, FFBMI 108, and MEP 110 are entered into a SQL server 202 (EDI entries 106 and MEP 110 pass through the SAPe before entering the SQL Server 202), such as the Microsoft SQLServer. In one or more embodiments, the data is transferred from the SQL server 202 to an associated data model 212 created on a QLIKVIEWe platform provided by QlikTech International AB Corporation of Schleelevagen Sweden. In one or more embodiments, a QLIKVIEWe (QVD) data generator 204 generates QVD files 206 from the SQL Server 202. In one or more embodiments, the QVD 206 files are data for the associative data model. 212. [0039] In one or more embodiments, other data, such as data submitted through EDI 106 and MEP 110, are stored on an SAPe 208 system provided by SAP Aktiengesellschaft Corporation of Dietmar-Hopp -Allee Germany. In one or more embodiments, a connector SAPe 210, developed by QLIKVIEWe allows downloading from the SAPe system to QVD files. This is illustrated in more detail in FIG. 3. In one or more embodiments, the SAPe system 208 includes a database (DB) 302 that is accessible to the Open SQL module 304, a query module SAPe Query 306 and a report module 308. In one or more Embodiments, each of these modules is accessible by the SAPe connector 210 through the respective functions of the QVC Remote Call Function (RFC) 301, 312, 314. In one or more embodiments, the SAPe connector 210 includes a SQL connector 316 that accesses the functionality of the Open SQL module 304. In one or more embodiments, the SAPe connector 210 includes a request connector 318 that accesses the functionality of the request module of the SAP 206. In a number of embodiments, the SAPe connector 210 includes a connector 320 that accesses the functionality of the report module 308. In one or more embodiments, a publisher QLIKVIEWe 322 executes software 3. 24 on a computer system 326 for generating QVD files 206. In one or more embodiments, the associative data model 212 (see FIG. 2B) includes a logistic data model 214 for strategic data, which stores data from transhipments, cargo carriers, customs brokers, consolidated lines and protected software (eg, AEP 112). In one or more embodiments, the associated data model 212 includes an open command report 216 for the non-strategic data, which stores reports from any field address to another field address or a field address. provider to an address that is not strategic. In one or more embodiments, a visualization data model 218 provides a portal through which data from the logistic data model 214 and the open control report 216 can be presented through a visualization presentation 220 on a screen. 222. [0042] In one or more embodiments of the data flow associated with the supply chain visualization application, illustrated in Figs. 2D-2H (which are arranged as illustrated in the key of Fig. 2H), the logistic data model 214 contains the shipping data 224, the data of the handling unit (HU) 226, the data of BO 228, delivery data 230 and logistics data 232. In one or more embodiments, data from logistic data model 214 is attached (block 234). In one or more embodiments, the open command table 216, which includes non-strategic delivery data 236, is used with the history file of BO 238, which contains the GR data, to calculate the GR data. for non-strategic deliveries 240. The data from block 234 and the GR dates calculated from block 240 are combined to create a display array of all orders-1 242. The AMI 244 data (i.e. -d., the internal product management data) and the organization data 246 are associated with the display array of all the commands-2 (block 248) to create the display array of all the commands-2 250. These data are associated with the dates of the purchase order calendar 252, the dates of the sales order schedule 254 and the expected on-site dates 256 (block 258). This data is associated with the associated logistics events 262 (strategic) 262, the data from the freight carrier 264 and the customs brokerage data 266 to create the display array of all orders-3,268. The additional event portal data 270 are associated 272, 274 with the logistics event data to create a logistic event (tracking) table 276 within the visualization data model 218. The additional event portal data 270 is associated 272, 278 with the array display of all -3,268 commands to create the display board of all-4 commands. This data is used to create a link table 282 with a control key and a reference number 284. A data reduction field is created for the display array of all commands-4280 (block 286) and a template. reduced (with a GR <30 days) is created (block 288), which is available for searching and displaying at an access point 290. As mentioned above, the additional event portal (AEP) 112 makes it possible to insert data into the SQL database, through a screen, such as that illustrated in FIG. 4, where it is validated against the SAP® system 208. The data sources, the entities, the addresses, the transformations made and the destination QVD files are described in Table 1 below: Table 1 Type Sources Entity Location Transformation performed QVD of data External Excel Forwarder SQL Server Stored procedure SQL- Add SAP reference data to freight carrier data FFLOGData (38 field report) Excel Customs brokerage files (26 Field report) SQL server SQL stored procedure Add SAP Baseline Data to Customs Brokerage Data Custom Brokerage SAP EDI - SQL Server Generate Event Key Type Sources Entity Location Transformation Completed QVD of Data Customs Brokerage Data Sending Handling Unit SAP Manual Event Portal Data - Freight Forwarder Portal Generate Handheld Events Handling Unit Key / Serveu r SQL SAP EDI - SQL Server Generate Handling Unit Key Transporter Data Internal Portal Additional Event Portal Data (AEP) Web Portal / Convert All Reference Numbers to Delivery Key Additional SQL Server Events SAP Top of Page Purchase Order QVD Connector Generate Purchase Order for Item Key SAP Logistics Order SAP Voucher Header Purchase Order Items QVD Connector Generate Purchase Order for Item Key Order Order Voucher Items SAP Logistics Sales Bids QVD Connector Generate Sales Order for Article Key Sales Vouchers SAP SAP Sales Voucher Articles QVD Connector Generate Sale Voucher for Article Key SAP Sales Voucher Articles Type Sources Entity Location QVD Transformation of SAP Data QVD Connector Flow Generate Sale Order for Article Key and Delivery Key SAP Sales Document Document Flow t Sales SAP Sales Document Partner QVD Connector Create Mapping Charts SAP Sales Partner SAP Sales Document Delivery QVD Connector Generate Delivery Key SAP Delivery SAP Delivery Items QVD Connector Generate Delivery Key Items from SAP Delivery SAP Reference Delivery Cross SQL Server Generate Delivery Key SAP Logistics Cross Delivery Cross Reference Send SQL Server Map Service Level and Transport Group Description SAP Logistics Shipping Sending Steps SQL Server Create Mapping Loads SAP Logistics Shipment Step Track QVD Connector Create Mapping Charts SAP Logistics Path SAP Billing Documents SQL Server Generate Item Key for Billing Document SAP Billing Documents Handling Unit SQL Server Generate Hand Unit Unit Key Type Sources Entity Location Transformation performed data QVD s SAP Logistics Handling Handling Unit Items SQL Server Generate Handling Unit Key, Create Mapping Load SAP Asset Handling Unit Items Assets (AMI Data) SQL Server Generate AMI and SAP ZAAUR Delivery Key Datasheet QVD Connector Create Mapping Charts SAP SAP Materials Device Datasheet SQL Server Create Mapping Charts SAP Device Datasheet Plant Materials SQL Server Create Mapping Charts SAP Organization Plant Materials PSL SQL Server Create Mapping Charges Organization SAP Plant SQL Server Create Mapping Loads SAP Plant Client SQL Server Create Mapping Charges SAP Customer Purchase Order Dates QVD Connector Generate Purchase Order for Item Key Purchase Order Dates SAP SAP Sales Order Dates QVD Connector Generate Sales Order for Item Key SAP Sales Order Dates SAP Art Date icle QVD Connector Generate Good Date of Type Article Sources Entity Location Transformation Completed QVD Data Sales Line SAP Sales for Key Article SAP Sales Order Line QVD Connector Voucher History Generate purchase order for the item key Order History of the SAP Order Form [0045] The Logistics Data Model 214 maps the charges when there is a one-to-one relationship between the fields as shown in the table 2 next: Table 2 Mapping Name Table Input Field Mapping Field Sales Voucher Profit Center Map Qvd of Sales Voucher Items Sales Voucher Article Profit Center Country Name Card Country. Qvd Country Code Country Name Country Map Country. Qvd Country OID Country Code Client Client Country Map. Qvd Customer Number Country Code Event Card Event Description. Qvd Event Identity Event Description Delivery Priority Service Level Map Delivery Priority (Online Table) Delivery Priority Level of Service Factory City Map Factory. Qvd Factory Number Factory City Plant Country Map Plant. Qvd Plant Number Plant Country Plant Name Map Plant. Qvd Factory number Plant name Plant type card Factory. Qvd Plant Number Factory Type [0046] In one or more embodiments, the logistics data model 214 is built on the framework of the associative data model 212 using strategic dispatch data from the SAP®. The data is stored in transformed tables in a QVD format to be used by the display data model 218. FIG. 5 and the other relationship diagrams described here (Figs 6 and 8-13) use a symbol of crow's feet. Each box with rounded corners represents a QVD chart. A line between the two tables indicates a relationship between the tables. A single line at each end of the line indicates a one-to-one relationship. A single line at one end of the line and a crow's foot at the other indicate a one-to-many relationship, with the crow's feet representing the "many" side of the relationship. An open circle with a crow's foot at one end of a line indicates zero or more. In one or more embodiments of the associative model 212, illustrated in FIG. 5, the mailing table 502 has a one-to-one relationship with the chart of the lane 504. In one or more embodiments, the mailing table 502 includes a sender number field (master key), a channel field and a send mode field. In one or more embodiments, the table of the items 502 has a one-to-many relationship with a table of the sending stages 506. In one or more embodiments, the table of the stadiums of send 506 includes a field of the number of the sending of the items (foreign keys,), a field of stages of sending and a field of the number of the forwarder of the sending. In one or more embodiments, the table of the items 502 has a one to zero relationship with a table of the header of the handling unit 508. In one or more embodiments , the header table of the handling unit 508 has an identifier field of the external handling unit (master key), a send number field, a handling unit number field, and a number field for sending the items (foreign key). In one or more embodiments, the header table of the handling unit 508 has a one-to-many relationship with the table of items of the handling line 510. In one or more embodiments, In several embodiments, the table of articles of the handling line 510 includes a field of the handling unit number (foreign key) and a delivery key field. In one or more embodiments, the array of articles in the line of the handling unit 510 has a one to zero relationship with a multiple delivery cross reference table 512. In one or more modes embodiment, the delivery cross reference table 512 includes a delivery key field (foreign key), a purchase order item key field (master key), a delivery number field, a country field original, a destination country field, a factory origin field, a destination factory field, a billing document number field, and a sales order number field. In one or more embodiments, the delivery cross reference table 512 has a one-to-many relationship with a table of purchase order items 514. In one or more embodiments, the table purchase order item 514 contains a purchase order item key field (master key), a purchase order number field, a command line item number field, a center field of profit and a factory field. In one or more embodiments, the table of items of the order form 514 has a one-to-one relationship with a table of the factory 516. In one or more embodiments, the table of the Factory 516 includes a Factory field (foreign key), a factory name field, and a country field of the factory. In one or more embodiments, the table of items of the order form 514 a one-to-one relationship with the organization table 518. In one or more embodiments, the organization table 518 comprises a profit center field (master key), a PSL name field (where "PSL" is an abbreviation for product service line), and a field under PSL. In one or more embodiments, illustrated in FIG. 6, the purchase order article table 514 (also shown in Fig. 5) has a one-to-many relationship with a logistics delivery cross reference table 602. In one or more embodiments, the 602 Log Shipping Cross Reference Table includes a delivery key field (foreign key), a purchase order item key (foreign key), a delivery quantity field, a key index field purchase order item, a purchase order lot key field, a key field of the total quantity received from the purchase order, a key field of the total item quantity required from the purchase order, and a purchase order item key from purchase order items. In one or more embodiments, the logistics delivery cross reference table 602 has a one-to-one relationship with a date array GR 604. In one or more embodiments, the date array GR 604 includes a delivery key field (foreign key), a Date 1 field of GR and a Date 2 field of GR, a field of Date 3 of GR and a field of Date 4 of GR. In one or more embodiments, the date array GR 604 has a one-to-one relationship with an array of the history of the purchase orders 606. In one or more embodiments, the table in FIG. purchase order history 606 includes purchase order item key field, purchase order item index key field, purchase order PO lot key field, field total quantity key received from the purchase order, a total quantity key field required from the purchase order, and a GR date field. In one or more embodiments, the date array GR 604 contains results of the application of the rules GR designed to capture the date GR from a POLI in the SAP® and to associate it with a item of the delivery line on an expedition. In one or more embodiments, the date GR 604 table contains four GR date networks (GR Date 1, GR Date 2, GR Date 3 and GR Date 4) (it will be understood that additional GR date networks are possible and are within the scope of the appended claims) that are used to correlate the GR date with the delivery line item, and are used in subsequent analyzes, described below, for determine if a POLI must be closed, which means that all shipments, including deliveries, related to the POLI, have been received (GR). In one or more embodiments, each of the date networks GR relates to a different scenario that occurs during the shipment of the goods. In each of these scenarios, in one or more embodiments: - several shipments are composed of delivery related to a POLI, - each of the multiple deliveries has a goods issue date (PGI) (ie, the the date the goods related to this shipment are physically moved from a warehouse or plant), - PGI dates have an order (eg, a date order and / or time order) - multiple deliveries are linked to the POLI, - each of the multiple deliveries related to the POLI has a delivery quantity; - each of the deliveries has a delivery item with a quantity of delivery item, as shown below in relation to scenario 3; - each of multiple deliveries related to POLI may have multiple GR events (ie, it is possible for goods from a single delivery to be received (GR) in multiple lots), - each of multiple events GR has a GR quantity and a GR date, - the GR dates have an order (eg, a date order and / or a time order), - the POLI has a required amount of POLI (c. ie, the quantity ordered under the POLI). In one or more embodiments, the GR network Date 1 concerns the scenario in which the quantities GR correspond to the delivery quantities but the order of the quantities GR is different from the order of the quantities delivered. For example, assuming the following scenario (all these data are linked to a single POLI): Scenario 1 Shipment Quantity of delivery Date PGI 1 40 June 1rst Event GR Quantity GR Date GR 1 60 1 st July 2014 2 60 3 June 2014 2014 2 40 July 3, 2014 [0062] In this scenario, Cargo 1, with a delivery quantity of 40, has an ERP date of June 1, 2014, and Cargo 2, with a delivery quantity of 60, has a PGI date of June 3, 2014. The GR 1 event, with a GR amount of 60, has a GR date of July 1, 2014, and the GR 2 event, with a GR amount of 40, has a GR date of July 3 2014. Cargo 1 and Cargo 2 were not divided into multiple deliveries; ie, the delivery quantities and GR quantities correspond (ie, the quantity delivered for Cargo 1 corresponds to the GR quantity for the GR 2 event and the quantity delivered for the Cargo 2 corresponds to the quantity GR for event 1). Therefore, in this scenario, setting a GR date for the shipment also establishes a GR date for delivery. Cargo 1 was received (GR) after Cargo 2 even if it was sent first, which could occur due to shipping delays, delays at Customs, or for a variety of reasons. other reasons. In one or more embodiments, this is confirmed by comparing the date GR and the date ATA. In one or more embodiments, the GR network Date 1 supports this situation. In one or more embodiments, a processor calculates the GR Date 1 network by - matching the delivery quantities of the multiple POLI-related dispatches to the GR quantities of the multiple POLI-related GR events (i.e. match a cargo 1 to the event GR 2 is the cargo 2 to the event GR 1), and - for each consignment, the registration of the delivery quantity, the date PGI for the delivery quantity, the quantity GR and the date GR for each correspondence in the GR network Date 1. [0064] In one or more embodiments, the result is a GR network Date 1 which contains the following data: Grid GR Date 1 for Scenario 1 Send Quantity of the Date PGI Quantity GR Date GR Delivery 1 40 1 June 2014 40 3 July 2014 2 60 3 June 2014 60 1 July 2014 [0065] In one or more embodiments, the GR network Date 1 also supports the situation in which several cargaiso ns linked to POLI have the same delivery quantities, as shown in scenario 2: Scenario 2 Shipment Quantity of delivery Date PGI 1 20 June 1, 2014 2 60 June 3, 2014 3 20 June 5, 2014 Event GR Quantity GR Date GR 1 60 1 July 2014 2 20 3 July 2014 3 20 5 July 2014 [0066] The matches in Scenario 2 are more difficult than the matches in Scenario 1 because Cargo 1 and 3 have the same quantities as the GR events 2 and 3.
[0005] In one or more embodiments, a processor calculates the GR Date 1 network by: - matching the delivery quantities of the multiple POLI related shipments to the GR quantities of the multiple GR events related to the POLI (i.e. match a cargo 1 to the event GR 2 and the cargo 2 to the event GR 1), - when the correspondence is ambiguous because at least a part of the delivery quantities linked to the POLI is equal (ie. -d., the delivery quantities for consignment 1 and consignment 3 are equal) and at least a part of GR quantities related to POLI is equal (ie GR quantities for events 2 and 3 are equal) (the ambiguity lies in whether the sending 1 must be linked to the event GR 2 or the event GR 3 is if the sending 3 must be linked to the event GR 2 or the event GR 3), - the resolution of this ambiguity by giving preference to the alignment of the control of s PGI dates at the order of the GR dates, and - for each consignment, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the GR quantity and the GR date for each correspondence in the GR network. Date 1. As for scenario 1, in one or more embodiments, the date GR for a delivery also establishes a date GR for sending. In one or more embodiments, the result is a GR network Date 1 which contains the following data: Grid GR Date 1 for Scenario 2 Shipping Quantity of the Date PGI Quantity GR Date GR Delivery 1 20 ler June 2014 20 July 3, 2014 2 60 June 3, 2014 60 July 1, 2014 3 20 June 5, 2014 20 July 5, 2014 [0069] In some embodiments, deliveries are divided into multiple delivery items, as shown in the following scenario 3: Scenario 3 Event GR Quantity GR Date GR 1 60 July 1, 2014 2 20 July 3, 2014 3 20 July 5, 2014 Shipment Quantity Date PGI Delivery Delivery Quantity Quantity 1 20 June 1, 2014 1 20 June 1 st 10 In one or more embodiments, the GR Date 2 network deals with this situation. In one or more embodiments, a processor calculates the GR Date 2 network by: - totaling the quantities of delivery items of deliveries related to the same shipment (i.e., the sum of the quantities of delivery items for deliveries related to shipment 1), - matching totalised delivery item quantities to GR quantities (ie, shipment 1 with quantities of delivery items added together corresponding to event GR 2 and consignment 3 corresponding to event GR 3), and - for each shipment, the record of the delivery quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity and the date GR for each GR network Date 2; The result is a GR Date 2 network that includes the data shown below: GR Network Date 2 for Scenario 3 Shipment Delivery Quantity Date PGI Quantity Quantity GR Date GR Delivery Item 1 20 June 1, 2014 10 20 3 July 2014 1 20 1 June 2014 10 20 3 July 2014 2 60 3 June 2014 60 60 1 July 2014 3 20 5 June 2014 20 20 5 July 2014 [0072] In one or more embodiments, the quantities GR do not correspond to the delivery quantities as shown in Scenario 4 below: Scenario 4 Sending Date PGI Quantity of the delivery 1 l June 20 2014 2 3 June 2014 60 3 5 June 2014 20 Event GR Quantity GR Date GR 1 10 July 1, 2014 2 10 July 3, 2014 3 60 July 5, 2014 4 July 7, 2014 [0073] In one or more embodiments, the GR network Date 3 deals with this situation. In one or more embodiments, a processor calculates the GR Date 3 network by: - totaling the quantities GR of a group of events GR so that the sum corresponds to a delivery quantity of one of the multiple deliveries ( eg, totaling the quantities of events GR 1 and 2 and matching this sum (20) to the delivery quantity of the delivery of the item 1), - determining a maximum of the dates GR from the group of GR events and recording it as a maximum GR date 3 (July 3, 2014, which is the maximum on July 1, 2014 and July 3, 2014), - changing the GR dates of the GR events in the group for maximum GR date 3 and - for each delivery, the record of the delivery quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the modified GR date in the network, GR Date 3. [0074] the result is a GR network Date 3 which includes the data illustrated above Or (note that Sending 1 has a GR date which is the most recent of the group of GR events that have been summed to match the delivery quantity of the shipment 1): GR Network Date 3 for Scenario 4 Sending Date PGI Quantity Quantity GR Date GR Delivery 1 l June 2014 20 20 3 July 2014 2 3 June 2014 60 60 5 July 2014 3 5 June 2014 20 20 7 July 2014 [0075] In one or more embodiments, the quantities of Delivery does not correspond to GR quantities, as shown in Scenario 5 below: Scenario 5 Sending Date PGI Quantity of the delivery 1 l June 20 2014 2 3 June 2014 60 3 5 June 2014 20 Event GR Quantity GR Date GR 1 85 1 July 2014 2 5 3 July 2014 3 10 5 July 2014 [0076] In one or more embodiments, the GR Date 4 network deals with this situation. In one or more embodiments, a processor calculates the GR Date 4 network by: - totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate summed GR quantities (ie, in scenario 4, the sum of the quantities GR is 10 + 10 + 60 + 20 = 100); - determining that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity needed for the POLI (assuming the necessary quantity is 100); - determining a maximum of the GR dates from the multiple GR events and recording it as a maximum GR date 4 (the maximum GR date is July 5, 2014), - changing the GR dates of the multiple GR events for the maximum GR date 4; - For each consignment, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the GR quantity and the modified date in the GR network Date 4. [0077] The result is a GR Date 4 network which includes the data shown below (note that all shipments have a GR date of the most recent GR events in the scenario): GR Network Date 4 for Scenario 5 Shipment Date PGI Quantity Quantity GR Date GR Delivery 1 June 1st 2014 20 85 July 5, 2014 2 June 3, 2014 60 5 July 5, 2014 3 June 5, 2014 20 10 July 5, 2014 [0078] In one or more embodiments, the date table GR 604 is created as follows: GR Date Table: Load Distinct PalTM QTY KEY INDEX, P0 Key, BATCH QTY REC INDEX KEY, P0 TOTAL QTY REC KEY, P0 REQ QTY KEY, [Delivery Key], Date (DLVRY Actual Goods Movement Date ], 'MM / DD / YYYY') as PGI Resident Date Delivery Xref; left join (GR date Table) load PalTM QTY INDEX KEY, [POH Posting Date] as GR Date 1 resident PO HIST; left join (GR date Table) load PO BATCH QTY REC INDEX KEY, [POH Posting Date] as GR Date 2 resident PO HIST; left Join (GR date Table) LOAD PO HIST PO KEY as PO Key, PO TOTAL QTY REC KEY, max ([POH Posting Date]) as GR Date 3 PO HIST PO KEY & "& Sum ([POH Receipt Quantity]) as PO TOTAL QTY REC KEY Resident PO HIST Where Exists (PO HIST PO KEY) Group by PO HIST PO KEY; Left Join (GR Date Table) LOAD PO HIST PO KEY as PO Key, PO HIST PO KEY & "& Sum ([POH Receipt Quantity] ) as PO ITM REQ QTY KEY, max ([POH Posting Date]) as GR Date 4 Resident PO HIST Where Exists (PO HIST PO KEY) Group by PO HIST PO KEY; In one or more embodiments, as also illustrated in Figs. 7A-7D (which are displayed as shown in the key of Fig. 7D), the GR data of Table 604 are created from: - a GR Date 1,702 which is created by associating: o an index key of section 704, which is created from the PO history of the QVD 606 file, with o a PO 706 delivery index key, which is created from the QVD 602 delivery cross reference file, which is in its possession. round created from a file of the articles of the order line QVD file 514; a date GR 708 which is formed by associating: a PO 710 batch key, which is created from the PO history of the QVD file 606, with a PO 712 delivery lot key, which is created from the QVD 602 Delivery Cross Reference File; a GR Date 3,714 which is formed by associating: a received item quantity key 716, which is created from the PO history of the QVD file 606, with a received item quantity key PO 718, which is created from the QVD 602 Delivery Cross Reference File; - a GR Date 4 720 which is formed by combining: o a required item quantity key PO 722, which is created from the PO history of the QVD 606 file, with o an item quantity key required PO 727, which is created from the QVD 602 delivery cross-reference file. [0080] In one or more embodiments, the GR 604 data table is compared to a table of delivery dates 726, which is created at from the QVD files containing the 728 Freight Forwarder monthly data, EDI (Forwarder and Broker) dates 730, and the Monthly Customs Broker 732 data, to determine the calculated GR date for each delivery and to determine whether the POLI should be to be closed on the basis of deliveries, as follows: - If the date GR Date 1> ATA and date GR Date 1> PGI (block 734) then the date GR calculated for delivery (block 736) is set to GR Date 1 ("yes" branch of block 734), otherwise (branch "No" of block 734): - If the date GR Date 2> ATA and the date GR Date 2> the date PGI (block 738) then the date GR calculated for the delivery (block 736) is set to GR Date 2 ( "yes" branch of block 738), otherwise ("no" branch of block 738): - If the date GR Date 3> ATA and the date GR Date 3> the date PGI (block 740) then the date GR calculated for the delivery (block 736) is set to GR Date 3 ("yes" branch of block 740, otherwise ("no" branch of block 740): - If date GR Date 4> ATA and date GR Date 4> date PGI (block 742) then the GR date calculated for delivery (block 736) is set to GR Date 4 ("yes" branch of block 742, otherwise ("no" branch of block 742): - the GR date for delivery is set to "null" (block 744), indicating that the POLI is still open. The data thus obtained are stored in the logistic dates file QVD 746. In one or more embodiments, the date networks GR have a hierarchy. In one or more embodiments, the order of the hierarchy is: GR network Date 1, GR network Date 2, GR network Date 3 and GR network Date 4. Ie, in one or more Embodiments: - if the GR network Date 1 can be calculated it will take precedence over the others, - if the GR network Date 1 can not be calculated by the GR network Date 2 can be calculated, the GR network Date 2 will take precedence on the others, - if the GR Date 1 network and the GR Date 2 network can not be calculated but can be done for the GR Date 3 network, the GR Date 3 network will take precedence over the others, and - the GR Network Date 4 will only be used if it can be calculated and no other network can be. In one or more embodiments, illustrated in FIG. 8, Logistics Data Model 214 calculates the most recent Bill of Lading or Bulk Consolidation Bullet number submission and combines the freight forwarder's and customs brokerage's monthly reports with the EDI data to the strategic shipping data at the freight forwarding level. handling unit. In one or more embodiments, the resulting QVD files are recorded for use by the visualization tool (shown below) and other reporting tools. In one or more embodiments, the table of items 502 (also shown in Fig. 5) has a one-to-many relationship with respect to the table of monthly data of the forwarder 702 (described above in connection with FIG. 7). In one or more embodiments, the table of items 502 has a one-to-many relationship with respect to the table of monthly customs brokerage data 704 (described above in connection with Fig. 7). In one or more embodiments, the table of items 502 has a one to zero relationship with respect to the table of send events 706 (described above in connection with Fig. 7). In one or more embodiments, the table of the items 502 has a one-to-many relationship with a table for calculating the priority of the EDI events 808. In one or more embodiments, the table of EDI 808 Event Priority Calculation includes an External Handling Unit (Foreign Key) identifier field, a minimum ATD date field, a maximum ATA date field, a BOL field, and a data field. departure from maximum customs. In one or more embodiments, illustrated in FIG. 9, Logistics Data Model 214 consolidates all internal events (ie within SAPe) and external events, which will allow for tracking at the handling unit level. In one or more embodiments, these data can be extrapolated to deliveries, shipments, purchase orders, sales order, material number, and so on. In one or more embodiments, a summary of the critical events with a verification of the country of origin and the final destination is calculated to provide a quick summary of the events. In one or more embodiments, the date GR is evaluated with the dates ATD and ATA to calculate the final GR date for the delivery of a line item, as described above in connection with FIGS. 7A-7D. In one or more embodiments, the table of items 502 has a one-to-many relationship with respect to the table of monthly customs brokerage data 704 (described above with respect to Fig. 7) and a one-to-one relationship. zero to many compared to the monthly data table of forwarder 702 (described above in connection with Fig. 7). In one or more embodiments, the monthly customs brokerage data table 902 and the monthly freight forwarder data table 904 are one to zero to many with a logistic event table 906. In one or more embodiments the mailing table 502 has a one-to-many relationship with respect to a table of send events 806 (described above in connection with Fig. 8) and a one-to-many relationship with a mailing table. calculating the priority of the EDI events 910. In one or more embodiments, the EDI 910 event priority calculation table has a one-to-many relationship with a table of delivery dates 912. In one or more modes In one embodiment, the date array GRI 604 has a one-to-many relationship with the delivery date table 912. [0088] In one or more embodiments, the event table Logistic 906 includes an identifier field of the external handling unit (foreign key), an EDI event field, an EDI event field, a forwarder event field, and a customs brokerage event field. In one or more embodiments, the EDI event priority calculation table 910 comprises a field of the identifier of the external handling unit (foreign key), a minimal date field ATD, a field ATA date maximum, a BOL field and a maximum customs start data field. [0090] In one or more embodiments, the delivery date table 912 includes a handling unit number field (foreign key), a delivery key field, and a date field GR. In one or more embodiments, illustrated in FIG. 10, an open order report has been created to capture all open orders, including vendor purchase orders and vendor redeployments, for which shipments have not been created or will not be created. In one or more embodiments, this data is chained to the strategic sending data for the visualization data model 214. In one or more embodiments, for the direct sales coupons (the shipments sent directly to the customers) in which orders are not processed in the SAP®, the data is removed from the view report 90 days after the PGI. In one or more embodiments, a completed delivery flag from the purchase order data is used to remove the completed past purchase orders. In one or more embodiments, the calculation of the GR date for the supplier's purchase order is made in the visualization data model 218. In one or more embodiments, the visualization events for the field deployments and the vendor purchase orders are captured through the additional event portal 112. In one or more embodiments, a purchase order header table 1002 has a one-to-one relationship with a table. sales order 1004 and a one-to-one relationship with the item table of the purchase order line 1006. In one or more embodiments, the sales order table 1004 has a one-to-one relationship. to several with a table of sales order items 1008. In one or more embodiments, the purchase order item table 1006 has a one-to-one relationship with an open order table 1010. In one or more embodiments, In several embodiments, the sales order article table 1008 has a one-to-one relationship with the open order table 1010. In one or more embodiments, the item order line item table sale 1008 has a one-to-many relationship with a sales document flow table 1012. In one or more embodiments, a delivery table 1014 has a one to zero relationship with an array of delivery items 1016. In one or more embodiments, the purchase order header table 1002 contains a purchase order number field (foreign key), a field of the original supplier. and a purchase order type code field. In one or more embodiments, the sales order table 1004 includes a sales slip number field (master key) and a SO type field. In one or more embodiments, the purchase order line item table 1006 contains a purchase order number field (master key), a field number of the order line item number. (foreign key), a material number field, a profit center field, and a completed delivery flag field. In one or more embodiments, the table of items of the line of the sales order 1008 contains a field of the number of the sales order (main key), an article field of the line of the sales order ( foreign key), a hardware number field, a home provider field, an article quantity field, and a completed delivery flag field. In one or more embodiments, the open order table 1010 contains a sales slip number field (foreign key), a sales order number field (foreign key), a delivery number field. , a sending field to a partner, an originator field, a PO type field, a completed delivery flag field, and an identifier field of the external handling unit. In one or more embodiments, the flow chart of the sales document 1012 contains a field of the sales order number (foreign key), a field of the article number of the sales order and a number field. delivery (main key). In one or more embodiments, the delivery table 1014 contains a field of the delivery number (main key), a column field, a sales document flow field of the sales document (foreign key) and a number field of the delivery flow of the sales document. In one or more embodiments, the delivery item table 1016 includes a delivery number field (foreign key) and a delivery item field and a delivery quantity field. In one or more embodiments, illustrated in FIG. 11, All order and factory materials tables are combined to form the PSL material for manufacturing orders. In one or more embodiments, a table of all the commands 1102 is a flow of the cross reference table of the delivery logistics 602 (shown above in conjunction with Fig. 6) and the open orders table 1010 ( presented above in conjunction with Fig. 10). In one or more embodiments, a table of the purchase order 1104 schedule lines has a relationship of one to zero or more with an array of all orders 1102. In one or more embodiments, an array of AMI data 1106 has a one to zero or many relationship with the array of all 1102 commands. In one or more embodiments, a factory hardware array 1108 has a one-to-one relationship with the array. 1102. In one or more embodiments, the array of all 1102 commands has a relationship of one to zero or more with an array of the lines of the sales order calendar 1110. In one or more modes In one embodiment, the array of all the commands 1102 has a one to zero or more relationship with a table of the date of the items in the coupon line 1112. In one or more embodiments , the table of the lines Purchase Order Schedule 1104 contains a purchase order item key field (master key), a field of the original first, a field of the confirmed quantity of the BC, and a confirmed onsite date field of the BC. In one or more embodiments, the AMI data table 1106 includes a field of the delivery number (main key) and a field of the AMI document number. In one or more embodiments, the array of plant material 1108 includes a plant material key field, a profit center field, and a PSL field. In one or more embodiments, the table of the lines of the sales order calendar 1110 contains a field of the number of the sales order (foreign key), a field of the article number of the sales order, a field confirmation data on site and a confirmed quantity field. [0106] In one or more embodiments, the sales item article table 1112 includes an item key field of the sales order (foreign key) and a field of the first confirmation date. In one or more embodiments, illustrated in FIG. 12, the data from the additional event portal 112 along with the forwarder and customs broker reports is added to the open order table 1010 where the EDI data is not received. In one or more embodiments, the priority of the events is: EDI> monthly data of the forwarder> AEP data. In one or more embodiments, a reference key is created in the logistic event table 906 for reasons which are presented below in connection with FIG. 13. [0108] In one or more embodiments, the delivery date table 912 (shown above in connection with Fig. 9) has a one-to-one relationship with the monthly customs brokerage data table. 704 (discussed above in connection with Fig. 7), the monthly data table of the forwarder 702 (shown above in connection with Fig. 6), a table of the events of the additional events portal 1204 and the open command table 1010 (shown above in connection with Fig. 10). The open command table 1010 has a one-to-one relationship with logistic event table 906 (discussed above in connection with Fig. 9). The monthly customs brokerage data table 704 and the monthly freight forwarder data table 702 are one to zero or more to a logistic event table 906. In one or more embodiments, the table additional event portal 1204 events includes a reference number field (master key), an ATD date field, an ATA date field, a customs start date field, a BOL field is a field type event. In one or more embodiments, illustrated in FIG. 13, the array of all commands 1102 (shown above in connection with Fig. 11) has a one to zero or more relationship with a link array 1302. The link array 1302 has a relationship of one to zero with logistic event table 906 (shown above in connection with Fig. 9). The array of all commands 1102 has a one-to-one relationship with the AMI data table 1106. The AMI data table 1106 (shown above in connection with Fig. 11) has a one to zero relationship. or more with a master equipment array 1306. The array of all the commands 1102 has a one-to-one relationship with the data table of the combination of shipments 1308. In one or more modes of realization, the link table 1302 includes a command key field (foreign key) and a field of the reference number (foreign key). In one or more embodiments, the link table 1302 is used to avoid duplicate or redundant information in the table of all the commands 1102 since the logistic events are received from multiple sources at multiple levels. handling, shipping, BC item, delivery and invoice). In order to display events at each level, a lowest-level key has been created to associate event data with data from all orders. In one or more embodiments, the master equipment table 1306 comprises an equipment number field (foreign key) and a description field of the equipment. In one or more embodiments, the data table of the sending association 1308 includes a send number field and a send association number field.
[0006] Applying Visualization Presentation [0114] In one or more embodiments, the visualization presentation application (ie, the supply chain visualization application) 220 improves and strengthens the supply chain process by making readily available the information on orders open to all shareholders; enabling improved communications, better planning, exception handling; and enabling proactive business decisions to ensure timely deliveries. In one or more embodiments, the display visualization algorithm 220 allows users to track shipments from a manufacturer or vendor to a port. In one or more embodiments, the display presentation algorithm 220 also provides the ability to track multi-arm movements that require non-air, sea, truck, and / or rail transplantation modes. In one or more embodiments, the display presentation algorithm 220 provides the ability to track goods as they pass through customs in different countries. In one or more embodiments, the display presentation algorithm 220 is a tool by which the performance of freight forwarders, customs brokers and other such entities can be analyzed. For example, with reference to FIG. 1, if a cargo from a company 114 through the freight forwarders 142 and 150 arrives at the final destination 154 before a cargo carried by the freight forwarder 138, this information may be useful for judging the performance of the freight forwarders 142, 150, 154 and the port agent 146. For example, such an analysis may result in more frequent use of one freight forwarder than another, or a decision to use a given forwarder only in a certain way, eg for airways rather than airways, railways, charter lanes and sea lanes. Thus, the application of the presentation of the visualization 220 is a tool with which the logistics department of a company can analyze and improve its performance. In one or more embodiments, the display presentation application 220 includes the following functionality, illustrated by the tabs on the screenshot illustrated in FIG. 14: - All orders: Summary of the completed order with logistic milestones and the expected arrival date; - Follow-up of the sending event: Detailed tracking page for individual orders; - Multiple Order Search: Order Summary for Requested Order Numbers; - Logistics Network Statistics: Vendor Analysis by Country and by Volume; - Canceled Vouchers: Details of open purchase orders with canceled sales vouchers; and - Methodology and Manual: Handbook of Learning and Documentation. Search Criterion [0117] In one or more embodiments, as shown in FIG. 15, orders can be searched for: - origin, including factory and country; - destination, including the country of destination, the recipient, the buyer and the country of purchase; - transport mode, service level, command PSL, PSL, hardware PSL; - movement, including type of origin (manufacture, supplier, field redeployments) and type of destination (manufacturing, fields and customers). - GR Yes / No - Helps users to choose open or closed orders - AMI Yes / No - Choice of assets - Created by delivery - User can select orders for which a delivery has been created - Value BC - Value BCs can be easily found [0118] In one or more embodiments, users can search for orders directly by reference number (BC number, sales note number, delivery number, shipment number, hardware number, AMI document number or billing document / invoice number). All Commands [0119] In one or more embodiments, choosing the "all commands" tab generates a hardware level detail with key logistic dates on the summary page, shown in FIG. 16 (column names only), which allows users to quickly view their commands with minimal effort and selection. In one or more embodiments, this table includes complete details from purchase orders, sales orders, material information, shipping, delivery, invoice, quantity, quantity confirmed, date delivery date, logistics key dates, GR date, PSL, mode, and origin and destination information. All Commands (Logistics Summary) [0120] In one or more embodiments, an "All Commands" screen (logistic summary), shown in FIG. 17 (column names only) provides an order summary at the submittal / invoice level 100 without doubling hardware-level data, which provides a quick summary of open orders (not receipt of goods) for logistics staff to enter events on the portal of additional events. In one or more embodiments, the screen also displays managers with a quick summary of open and in-transit cargoes by BOL, Origin, Destination and PSL.
[0007] Cargo Tracking [0121] In one or more embodiments, the cargo tracking page of the tool, shown in FIG. 18, allows detailed tracking of each order from the delivery to create a GR. In one or more embodiments, the user may search with any reference number of a command. In one or more embodiments, this feature allows easy access to logistic and SAP® dates from multiple sources at one location. In one or more embodiments, the use can retrieve complete details of tracking with all scans including, without limitation, received / boarded transhipment scans, factory origin of origin, forwarder events from multiple sources , SAP events and also an event at the purchase order level (GR date). In one or more embodiments, all commands may be tracked using an SAP® reference number or even an external BOL reference and the customs declaration number. In one or more embodiments, the illustrated events are not doubled at each box while the logic has been integrated into the data model to consolidate the events based on the largest reference number. Historical Viewer [0123] In one or more embodiments, the supply chain viewer rejects all orders that have GR dates greater than 30 days from the current date. In one or more embodiments, these closed commands can be viewed in a historical visualization report that uses the same concept as the supply chain visualization data model but restricted to closed orders. In one or more embodiments, the historical report is accessible to users from the supply chain visualization tool by clicking on the "Historical Data" key shown in Figure 15, which transfers the current selections to from the existing report to a new report. In one or more embodiments, this feature uses the QLIKVIEW® document flow feature. The presentation layer and the selection criteria on the Historical View report are the same as for the Supply Chain Viewer so that users can easily retrieve and analyze closed order data. Statistics of the Logistics Network [0124] In one or more embodiments, a statistical tool of the logistics network, illustrated in FIG. 19, provides an analysis of the supplier's shipments and the volume of orders by country.
[0008] In-Place Sales Cancelation Statistics In one or more embodiments, a sales note cancellation notification tool, illustrated in FIG. 20, allows viewing of canceled sales orders, when purchase orders are not identified as deleted in SAP®. Procurement and materials users can identify the problem with open purchase orders when sales orders have been canceled and can take action. Search for Multiple Commands [0126] In one or more embodiments, an Advanced Multiple Order Search is a free form search form (not shown) designed for experienced users who feel comfortable using extended features. to track a BC number, invoices, shipments, deliveries and materials. Once the user has entered or copied the known selections, ie, the purchase orders, separated by commas or spaces, the system provides details on these selections, such as the details described in above in relation to the discussion on the "All Orders" tab in Fig. 16. In one or more embodiments, the hardware delay is used to check scheduled events at each key location. In order to deliver a product on the scheduled delivery date, it is possible to calculate the goods issue from a manufacturing location or supplier using the total lead time from the date the order is to be delivered. [0128] In one or more embodiments, stop light indicators per BC line / cargo based on the planned delivery logic allows proactive upstream exception handling. In one or more embodiments, critical business decisions could be made in time to either change the mode of transportation or to search for another vendor to avoid delivery delays to customers. [0129] In one or more embodiments, an e-mail notification is provided with the order tracking. In one or more embodiments, complete tracking details are provided to customers through automatic notification of key events. In one or more embodiments, SAP® data embedded in the forwarder or mail events is sent by the system upon request. [0130] In one or more embodiments, a multi-arm tracking notification is added to assist the transshipment and clients to obtain pre-alerts for the expected arrival at each arm of the shipment. In one aspect, a processor calculates the merchandise receipt date (GR) for an item of the purchase order line (POLI) based on the multiple cargoes related to the POLI and the multiple GRs related to the POLI entered at one time. location on the ground. In one aspect, multiple deliveries related to an item of the purchase order line (POLI) are identified. Each of the multiple deliveries has a delivery quantity and is a goods issue date (PGI). Each ERP date represents the date on which the goods for the respective delivery were physically moved from a warehouse to a factory. PGI dates have an order. Multiple shipments, each linked to a delivery, are identified. Each of the multiple shipments has a shipping amount. Multiple Merchandise Received (GR) events for multiple deliveries related to POLI are identified. Each of the multiple events GR has a quantity GR and a date GR. GR dates have an order. A quantity required for the POLI is identified. A processor calculates a GR Date 1 network by: matching the POLI delivery quantities to the GR quantities of the multiple GR events related to the POLI. The correspondence is ambiguous because at least a part of the delivery quantities related to the POLI is equal and at least a part of the GR quantities linked to the POLI is equal. The ambiguity is resolved by giving preference to the alignment of the order of dates PGI to the order of dates GR. For each delivery, the delivery quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the GR quantity and the GR date for each correspondence is recorded in the GR Date 1 network. The processor calculates a GR Date 2 network by totaling the quantities of delivery of deliveries related to this shipment, by matching the totaled delivery quantities with the GR quantities, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the quantity GR and the date GR in the GR network Date 2. The processor calculates a GR Date 3 network by summing the GR quantities of a GR event group so that the total corresponds to a delivery quantity of one of the multiple deliveries, the determination a maximum for the GR dates from the GR events and recording as maximum GR date 3, changing the GR dates of the GR events in the group for the maximum GR date 3, and, for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR changed GR date in the GR network Date 3. The processor calculates a GR Date 4 network by totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities, the determination that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, the determination of a maximum for the GR dates from the multiple GR events, and registering as maximum GR date 4, changing the GR dates of the multiple GR events for the maximum GR date 4, and, for each delivery, the recording of the delivery quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the quantity Totalized GR and GR changed GR date in the GR network Date 4. For each shipment, an ATA Date is identified as the actual time of arrival of the cargo. The following condition is determined to be false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR Date GR Date 1> ATA Date and GR Date GR Date 1> PGI Date). The following condition is determined to be false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR Date GR Date 2> ATA Date and GR Date GR Date 2> PGI Date). The following condition is determined to be false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR Date GR Date 3> ATA Date and GR Date GR Date 3> PGI Date). The following condition is determined to be false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR Date GR Date 4> ATA Date and GR Date GR Date 4> PGI Date). Therefore, it is determined that the purchase order is still open. In one aspect, multiple deliveries related to an item of the purchase order line (POLI) are identified. Each of the multiple deliveries has a delivery quantity and a goods issue date (PGI). Each ERP date represents the date on which the goods for the respective delivery were physically moved from a warehouse to a factory. PGI dates have an order. Multiple shipments, each linked to a delivery, are identified.
[0009] Each of the multiple shipments has a shipping amount. Multiple Merchandise Received (GR) events are identified for POLI multiple deliveries. Each of the multiple events GR has a quantity GR and a date GR. GR dates have an order. A quantity required for the POLI is identified. A processor calculates a GR Date 1 network by matching the POLI delivery quantities to the GR quantities of the multiple GR events related to the POLI. The correspondence is ambiguous because at least a part of the delivery quantities related to the POLI is equal and at least a part of the GR quantities linked to the POLI is equal. The ambiguity is resolved by giving preference to the alignment of the order of dates PGI to the order of dates GR. For each delivery, the delivery quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the GR quantity and the GR date for each correspondence are recorded in the GR Date 1 network. The processor calculates a GR Date 2 network by totaling the quantities of delivery of deliveries related to this shipment, by matching the totaled delivery quantities with the GR quantities, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the quantity GR and the date GR in the GR network Date 2. The processor calculates a GR Date 3 network by summing the GR quantities of a GR event group so that the total corresponds to a delivery quantity of one of the multiple deliveries, the determination a maximum for GR dates from GR events and recording as maximum GR date 3, changing GR dates GR events in the group for the maximum GR date 3, and, in for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR changed GR date in the GR network Date 3. The processor calculates a GR Date 4 network by totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities, the determination that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, the determination of a maximum for the GR dates from the multiple GR events and the registering as maximum GR date 4, changing the GR dates of the multiple GR events for the maximum GR date 4, and, for each delivery, the recording of the delivery quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the Totalized GR quantity and GR changed GR date in the GR network Date 4, and, for each shipment, the determination of an ATA date dates as the actual time of arrival of the shipment. The GRDATE1 condition is determined to be true for at least one of the deliveries: (GR Date GR Date 1> ATA Date and GR Date GR Date 1> PGI Date). The definition of a date GR for each of the at least one delivery for which condition GRDATE1 is true for the respective GR date for delivery in the GR network Date 1. [0134] In one aspect, articles of multiple deliveries related to an item of the Purchase Order Line (POLI) are identified. Each item of the multiple deliveries has a delivery quantity and a goods issue date (PGI). Each ERP date represents the date on which the goods for the respective delivery item were physically moved from a warehouse to a factory. PGI dates have an order. Multiple cargoes are identified. Each of the multiple shipments has a shipping amount. Each shipment is linked to a delivery. Each delivery is linked to a delivery item. At least one of the deliveries is related to a plurality of delivery items. Multiple Merchandise Received (GR) events for multiple delivery items related to POLI are identified. Each of the multiple events GR has a quantity GR and a date GR. GR dates have an order. A quantity required for the POLI is identified. A processor calculates a GR Date 1 network by matching POLI related delivery item quantities to GR quantities of the multiple GR events related to the POLI. The correspondence is ambiguous because at least a portion of the delivery article quantities related to the POLI is equal and at least a portion of the quantities GR related to the POLI is equal.
[0010] The ambiguity is resolved by giving preference to the alignment of the order of dates PGI to the order of dates GR. For each delivery item, the delivery item quantity, the PGI date for the delivery item quantity, the GR quantity, and the GR date for each match are recorded in the GR Date 1 network. The processor calculates a network GR Date 2 by totaling the delivery article quantities of the delivery items related to this shipment, matching the totalised delivery item quantities with the GR quantities, and for each delivery, recording the quantity of delivery items delivery item, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the GR quantity, and the GR date in the GR Date 2 network. The processor calculates a GR Date 3 network by summing the GR quantities of a GR event group so that the total corresponds to a delivery item quantity of one of the multiple deliveries, the determination of a maximum for the GR dates from the GR event group and recording it as a maximum G R date 3, changing the GR dates of the GR events in the group for the maximum GR date 3, and, for each delivery item, the record of the delivery item quantity, the PGI date for the quantity of delivery item, the totalized GR quantity, and the GR changed date GR in the GR network Date 3. The processor calculates a GR Date 4 network by summing the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a GR summest, the determination that the summed GR quantities is equal to the amount required for the POLI, determining a maximum for GR dates from multiple GR events and recording it as maximum GR date 4, changing GR dates of multiple GR events for the maximum GR date 4, and, for each delivery item, the record of the delivery item quantity, the PGI date for the delivery item quantity, the totalized GR quantity, and the GR changed GR date in l e GR network Date 4. For each shipment, a date ATA is identified as the actual time of arrival of the cargo. The following GRDATE1 condition is determined to be false for at least one of the delivery items: (GR Date GR Date 1> ATA Date and GR Date GR Date 1> PGI Date). The following GRDATE2 condition is determined to be true for at least one of the deliveries. (GR date of GR Date 2> ATA Date and GR date of GR Date 2> PGI Date). The GR date for each of the deliveries for which the GRDATE2 condition is true is defined as the respective GR date for delivery in the GR Date 2 network. [0135] In one aspect, multiple deliveries related to an item of the coupon line control (POLI) are identified. Each of the multiple deliveries has a delivery quantity and a goods issue date (PGI). Each PGI date represents the date on which the goods for the respective delivery were physically moved from a warehouse or factory. PGI dates have an order. Multiple shipments, each linked to a delivery, are identified. Each of the multiple shipments has a shipping amount. Multiple Merchandise Received (GR) events for multiple deliveries related to POLI are identified. Each of the multiple events GR has a quantity GR and a date GR. GR dates have an order. A quantity required for the POLI is identified. A processor calculates a GR Date 1 network by matching the POLI delivery quantities to the GR quantities of the multiple GR events related to the POLI. Here, the correspondence is ambiguous because at least a part of the delivery quantities linked to the POLI is equal and at least a part of the GR quantities linked to the POLI is equal.
[0011] The ambiguity is resolved by giving preference to the alignment of the order of dates PGI to the order of dates GR. For each delivery, the delivery quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the GR quantity and the GR date for each correspondence are recorded in the GR Date 1 network. The processor calculates a GR Date 2 network by totaling the quantities of delivery of deliveries related to this shipment, by matching the totaled delivery quantities with the GR quantities, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the quantity GR and the date GR in the GR network Date 2. The processor calculates a GR Date 3 network by summing the GR quantities of a GR event group so that the total corresponds to a delivery quantity of one of the multiple deliveries, the determination a maximum for GR dates from GR events and recording as maximum GR date 3, changing GR dates GR events in the group for the maximum GR date 3, and, in for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 3. The processor calculates a GR Date 4 network by totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities, the determination that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, the determination of a maximum for the GR dates from the multiple GR events, and recording as maximum GR date 4, changing GR dates of multiple GR events for maximum GR date 4; for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 4. For each shipment, a date ATA is identified as the real time of arrival of the cargo. The GRDATE1 condition is determined to be false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR Date GR Date 1> ATA Date and GR Date GR Date 1> PGI Date). The following GRDATE2 condition is determined to be false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 2> ATA Date and GR date of GR Date 2> PGI Date). The following GRDA1E3 condition is determined to be true for at least one of the deliveries: (GR Date GR Date 3> ATA Date and GR Date GR Date 3> PGI Date). The date GR for each of the at least one delivery for which condition GRDATE3 is true for the respective GR date for delivery in the GR network Date 3. [0136] In one aspect, multiple deliveries related to an item of the purchase order line (POLI) are identified. Each of the multiple deliveries has a delivery quantity and a goods issue date (PGI). Each ERP date represents the date on which the goods for the respective delivery were physically moved from a warehouse to a factory. PGI dates have an order. Multiple shipments, each linked to a delivery, are identified. Each of the multiple shipments has a shipping amount. Multiple Merchandise Received (GR) events for multiple deliveries related to POLI are identified. Each of the multiple events GR has a quantity GR and a date GR. GR dates have an order. A quantity required for the POLI is identified. A processor calculates a GR Date 1 network by matching the POLI delivery quantities to the GR quantities of the multiple GR events related to the POLI. The correspondence is ambiguous because at least a part of the delivery quantities related to the POLI is equal and at least a part of the GR quantities linked to the POLI is equal.
[0012] The ambiguity is resolved by giving preference to the alignment of the order of dates PGI to the order of dates GR. For each delivery, the delivery quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the GR quantity and the GR date for each correspondence are recorded in the GR Date 1 network. The processor calculates a GR Date 2 network by totaling the quantities of delivery of deliveries related to this shipment, by matching the totaled delivery quantities with the GR quantities, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the quantity GR and the date GR in the GR network Date 2. The processor calculates a GR Date 3 network by summing the GR quantities of a GR event group so that the total corresponds to a delivery quantity of one of the multiple deliveries, the determination a maximum for GR dates from GR events and recording as maximum GR date 3, changing GR dates GR events in the group for the maximum GR date 3, and, in for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 3. The processor calculates a GR Date 4 network by totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities, the determination that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, the determination of a maximum for the GR dates from the multiple GR events, and registering as maximum GR date 4, changing the GR dates of the multiple GR events for the maximum GR date 4, and, for each delivery, the recording of the delivery quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the quantity Totalized GR and GR date changed in the GR network Date 4. For each shipment, an ATA date is identified as the actual time of arrival of the cargo. The GRDA1E1 condition is determined to be true for at least one of the deliveries: (GR Date GR Date 1> ATA Date and GR Date GR Date 1> PGI Date). The following GRDA1E2 condition is determined to be false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 2> ATA Date and GR date of GR Date 2> PGI Date). The following GRDATE3 condition is determined to be false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR Date GR Date 3> ATA Date and GR Date GR Date 3> PGI Date). The following GRDATE4 condition is determined to be false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR Date GR Date 4> ATA Date and GR Date GR Date 4> PGI Date). The definition of a date GR for each of the at least one delivery for which the GRDATE4 condition is true for the respective GR date for delivery in the GR network Date 4. [0137] In one aspect, a processor receives and stores logistic data concerning an item in the purchase order line (POLI). The logistics data includes a plurality of items. Each shipment includes deliveries related to an item in the purchase order line (POLI). Each of the deliveries has a delivery quantity and a goods issue date (PGI). Logistics data also includes a plurality of logistic services for the plurality of shipments including deliveries related to the POLI. One of the plurality of shipments, a multi-mode shipment, includes a plurality of sequential logistic services. The logistics data also includes a plurality of deliveries related to the POLI, wherein the processor identifies a quantity of goods received (GR), and a date GR for each delivery. The processor allows the display of the PGI date and GR date for the multimode send. The implementations of the invention may include one or more of the following elements. The processor receiving and storing logistic data relating to the POLI may include receiving data from selected logistics data providers in a group consisting of freight forwarders and customs brokers. The plurality of sequential logistics services may comprise a first mode of transport operated by a first supplier, the first supplier transporting the multi-mode cargo from a first location to a second location, and a second mode of transport operated by a second provider, different from the first, the second supplier carrying the multi-mode cargo from a second location to a third location. The determination of the date GR for each of the deliveries may involve the calculation of the GR dates by the processor for deliveries related to the multi-mode cargo based on the plurality of deliveries related to the POLI. The plurality of sequential logistics services may include a service provided by a freight handling company, a service provided by a courier company and a service provided by a logistics customs broker. The plurality of sequential logistics services may be selected from a group consisting of a service provided by a freight handling company, a service provided by a courier company and a service provided by a logistics customs broker. The word "coupled" used here means a direct connection or an indirect connection. The text presented above describes one or more specific embodiments of a broader invention. The invention is also embodied in a variety of alternative embodiments and is therefore not limited to those described herein. The foregoing description of an embodiment of the invention has been presented for illustrative and descriptive purposes. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the lessons given above. It is contemplated that the scope of this invention is limited not by the detailed description, but rather by the appended claims.

权利要求:
Claims (12)
[0001]
REVENDICATIONS1. A method comprising: a processor calculating the received merchandise date (GR) for an item of the purchase order line (POLI) based on the multiple POLI related shipments and the POLI related multiple GRs entered in a location field.
[0002]
2. A method comprising: identifying multiple deliveries related to an item of the purchase order line (POLI), each of multiple deliveries having a delivery quantity and a goods issue date (PGI), each PGI date being the date that the goods for the respective delivery were physically moved from a warehouse to a factory, the PGI dates having an order; identifying multiple shipments each related to a delivery, wherein each of the multiple shipments has a shipment quantity; identifying multiple received goods events (GRs) for the multiple deliveries related to the POLI, wherein each of the multiple GR events has a GR amount and a GR date, and the GR dates have an order; identification of a quantity required for the POLI; a processor calculating a GR network Date 1 by: matching the delivery quantities linked to a POLI to the quantities GR of the multiple GR events related to the POLI, wherein the correspondence is ambiguous because at least a portion of the delivery quantities related to the POLI is equal and at least a part of the GR quantities related to the POLI is equal, the resolution of this ambiguity giving preference to the alignment of the order of the PGI dates with respect to the GR order of dates, for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, and the GR date for each correspondence in the GR network Date 1 the processor calculating a GR Date 2 network by: totaling the delivery quantities of the deliveries related to the same shipment, matching the totalized delivery quantities to the GR quantities, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the GR quantity and GR date for the GR network Date 2 the processor calculating a GR Date 3 network by: totaling the GR quantities of a GR event group so that the sum corresponds to a delivery quantity from one of the multiple deliveries, determining a maximum of the GR dates from the GR event group and saving it as a maximum GR date 3, changing the GR dates of the GR events in the group for 1 () maximum GR date 3, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR Date 3 network; the processor calculating a GR Date 4 network by: totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities; determine that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, determine a maximum of the GR dates from the multiple GR events and register it as a maximum GR date 4, change the GR dates of the multiple GR events for the GR maximum date 4, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 4; for each shipment, determination of an ATA date as the actual time of arrival of the cargo. the determination that the following condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date I> ATA Date and GR date of GR Date I> PGI Date); 30 the determination that the following condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 2> ATA GR date and date GR Date 2> PGI Date); the determination that the following condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 3> ATA GR date and date GR Date 3> PGI Date); the determination that the following condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 4> ATA Date and GR date of GR Date 4> PGI Date); and the determination, therefore, that the purchase order is still open.
[0003]
3. A method comprising: identifying multiple deliveries related to an item of the purchase order line (POLI), wherein each of the multiple deliveries has a delivery quantity and a goods issue date (PGI), each date PGI being the date on which the goods for the respective delivery were physically moved from a warehouse to a factory, the PGI dates having an order; identifying multiple shipments each related to a delivery, wherein each of the multiple shipments has a shipment quantity; identifying multiple received goods events (GRs) for multiple deliveries related to the POLI, wherein each of the multiple GR events has a GR amount and a GR date, and the GR dates have an order; identification of a quantity required for the POLI; a processor calculating a GR Date 1 network by: matching POLI related delivery quantities to the GR quantities of the multiple GR events related to the POLI, wherein the correspondence is ambiguous because at least a portion of the related delivery quantities to the POLI is equal and at least a part of the quantities GR related to the POLI is equal, the resolution of this ambiguity giving preference to the alignment of the order of the PGI dates with respect to the order of the dates GR, 25 for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, and the GR date in the GR network Date 1 the processor calculating a GR Date 2 network by: totaling the delivery quantities of the related deliveries the same consignment, matching the totalized delivery quantities to GR quantities, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the quantity GR and the date GR for the GR network Date 2 the processor calculating a GR network Date 3 by: totaling the quantities GR of a group of events GR so that the sum corresponds to a delivery quantity of one multiple deliveries, determining a maximum of the GR dates from the GR event group and saving it as a maximum GR date 3, changing the GR dates of the GR events in the group for maximum GR date 3, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR Date 3 network; the processor calculating a GR Date 4 network by: totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities; determine that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, determine a maximum of the GR dates from the multiple GR events and record it as a maximum GR date 4, change the GR dates of the multiple GR events for the maximum GR date 4, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 4; for each shipment, determination of an ATA date as the actual time of arrival of the cargo; Determination that the following GRDATE1 condition is true for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date GR Date 1> ATA GR date and date GR Date 1> PGI Date); anddefining a date GR for each of the at least one delivery for which the condition GRDATE1 is true with respect to the respective GR date for delivery in the GR network Date 1.
[0004]
4. A method comprising: identifying multiple delivery items related to an item of the purchase order line (POLI), each of multiple delivery items having an item delivery quantity and a goods issue date ( PGI), with each PGI date being the date on which the goods for the respective delivery item were physically moved from a warehouse or plant, the PGI dates having an order; identification of multiple shipments, in which each of the multiple shipments has a shipment quantity, in which each shipment is linked to a delivery, each delivery is linked to a delivery item, and at least one of the deliveries is linked to a shipment; plurality of delivery items; identifying multiple received goods events (GRs) for the multiple delivery items related to the POLI, wherein each of the multiple GR events has a GR amount and a GR date, and the GR dates have an order; identification of a quantity required for the POLI; a processor calculating a GR Date 1 network by: matching POLI delivery item quantities to GR quantities of the multiple GR events related to the POLI, where the match is ambiguous because at least a portion of the article quantities POLI-related delivery is equal and at least a portion of the GR quantities related to the POLI is equal, resolving this ambiguity by giving preference to aligning the order of the PGI dates with the ordering of the GR dates, and for each delivery item, the record of the delivery item quantity, the PGI date for the delivery item quantity, and the GR date for each correspondence in the GR network Date 1; the processor calculating a GR Date 2 network by: totaling the delivery article quantities of the delivery items related to the same consignment, matching the totalised delivery article quantities with the GR quantities, and for each delivery, the registration of the totalized delivery item quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the GR quantity, and the GR date for the GR Date 2 network; the processor calculating a GR Date 3 network by: totaling the quantities GR of a group of events GR so that the sum corresponds to a quantity of delivery item of one of the multiple deliveries, determining a maximum of the dates GR from the event group GR and 1 () registering it as a maximum date GR GR 3, changing the GR date GR events in the group for maximum GR date 3, and for each delivery, recording the delivery item quantity, PGI date for the delivery item quantity, totalized GR quantity, and GR 15 date changed in the GR Date 3 network; the processor calculating a GR Date 4 network by: totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities; determine that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI 20, determine a maximum of the GR dates from the multiple GR events and record it as a maximum GR date 4, change the GR dates of the multiple GR events to the GR maximum GR date 4, for each delivery item, record the delivery item quantity, 25 the PGI date for the delivery item quantity, the totalized GR quantity, and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 4 ; for each shipment, determination of an ATA date as the actual time of arrival of the cargo; determine that the following GRDATE1 condition is not true for at least one of the 30 delivery items: (GR date of GR Date 1> ATA GR date and GR date Date 1> PGI Date) determine that condition GRDA1E2 The following is true for at least one of the deliveries (GR Date GR Date 2> ATA Date and GR Date GR Date 2> PGI Date); and defining the GR date for each of the deliveries for which the GRDA1E2 condition is true for the respective GR date in the GR Date 2 network.
[0005]
5. A method comprising: identifying multiple deliveries related to an item of the purchase order line (POLI), wherein each of the multiple deliveries has a delivery quantity and a goods issue date (PGI), each date PGI being the date on which the goods for the respective delivery were physically moved from a warehouse to a factory, the PGI dates having an order; identifying multiple shipments each linked to a delivery, where each of the multiple shipments has a shipment quantity; identifying multiple received goods events (GRs) for the multiple deliveries related to the POLI, wherein each of the multiple GR events has a GR amount and a GR date, and the GR dates have an order; identification of a quantity required for the POLI; a processor calculating a GR network Date 1 by: matching the delivery quantities linked to a POLI to the quantities GR of the multiple GR events related to the POLI, wherein the correspondence is ambiguous because at least a portion of the delivery quantities related to the POLI is equal and at least a portion of the quantities GR related to the POLI is equal, the resolution of this ambiguity giving preference to the alignment of the order of the PGI dates to the order of the dates of GR, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI of the delivery quantity, the quantity GR, and the GR for each correspondence in the GR network Date 1; the processor calculating a GR Date 2 network by: totaling the delivery quantities of the deliveries related to the same shipment, matching the totalized delivery quantities with the quantities GR, and for each delivery, the recording of the delivery quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the quantity GR and the date GR for the network GR Date 2 the processor calculating a network GR Date 3 by: totaling the quantities GR of a group of events GR so that the sum corresponds to a quantity of delivery of one of the multiple deliveries, determining a maximum of the GR dates from the GR event group and saving it as a maximum GR date 3, changing the GR dates of the GR events in the group for 1 () maximum GR date 3, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR Date 3 network; the processor calculating a GR Date 4 network by: totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities; determine that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, determine a maximum of the GR dates from the multiple GR events and register it as a maximum GR date 4, change the GR dates of the multiple GR events for the GR maximum date 4, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 4; for each shipment, determination of an ATA date as the actual time of arrival of the cargo; determining that the following GRDATE1 condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: 30 (GR date GR Date 1> ATA GR date and date GR Date 1> PGI Date); the determination that the following GRDATE2 condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 2> ATA GR date and date GR Date 2> PGI Date); the determination that the following GRDATE3 condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 3> ATA Date and GR date of GR Date 3> PGI Date); and defining a GR date for each of the at least one delivery for which the GRDATE3 condition is true for the respective GR date for delivery in the GR Date 3 network.
[0006]
6. A method comprising: identifying multiple deliveries related to an item of the purchase order line (POLI), wherein each of the multiple deliveries has a delivery quantity and a goods issue date (PGI), each date PGI being the date on which the goods for the respective delivery were physically moved from a warehouse to a factory, the PGI dates having an order; identifying multiple shipments each linked to a delivery, where each of the multiple shipments has a shipment quantity; identifying multiple received goods events (GRs) for the multiple deliveries related to the POLI, wherein each of the multiple GR events has a GR amount and a GR date, and the GR dates have an order; identification of a quantity required for the POLI; a processor calculating a GR network Date 1 by: matching the delivery quantities linked to a POLI to the quantities GR of the multiple GR events related to the POLI, wherein the correspondence is ambiguous because at least a portion of the delivery quantities related to the POLI is equal and at least a portion of the quantities GR related to the POLI is equal, the resolution of this ambiguity giving preference to the alignment of the order of dates of PGI to the order of the dates of GR, and for each delivery, registration of the delivery quantity, the PGI of the delivery quantity, the quantity GR, and the GR for each correspondence in the GR network Date 1; the processor calculating a GR Date 2 network by: totaling the delivery quantities of the deliveries related to the same shipment, matching the totalized delivery quantities to the GR quantities, and for each delivery, the delivery quantity record, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the quantity GR and the date GR for the network GR Date 2 the processor calculating a network GR Date 3 by: totaling the quantities GR of a group of events GR so that the sum corresponds to a quantity delivery of one of the multiple deliveries, determining a maximum of the GR dates from the GR event group and 1 () registering it as a maximum GR date 3, changing the GR dates of the GR events in the group for maximum date GR 3, and for each delivery, the record of the delivery quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 3; the processor calculating a GR Date 4 network by: totaling the GR quantities of the multiple GR events to generate a summed GR quantities; determine that the summed GR quantities is equal to the quantity required for the POLI, determine a maximum of the GR dates from the multiple GR events and record it as a maximum GR date 4, change the GR dates of the multiple GR events for the maximum GR date 4, and 25 for each delivery, the record of the delivery quantity, the PGI date for the delivery quantity, the totalized GR quantity and the GR date changed in the GR network Date 4; for each shipment, determination of an ATA date as the actual time of arrival of the cargo; 30 the determination that the following GRDAIEI condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date GR Date I> ATA GR date and date GR Date I> PGI Date) the determination that the following GRDATE2 condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 2> ATA Date and GR date of GR Date 2> PGI Date); the determination that the following GRDAIE3 condition is false for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 3> ATA Date and GR date of GR Date 3> PGI Date); determining that the following GRDATE4 condition is true for at least one of the deliveries: (GR date of GR Date 4> ATA GR date and date GR Date 4> PGI Date); and defining the date GR for each of the at least one delivery for which the GRDATE4 condition is true for the respective GR date for delivery in the GR network Date 4.
[0007]
A method comprising: a processor receiving and storing logistic data relating to an item of the purchase order line (POLI), the logistics data comprising: a plurality of items, each item including deliveries related to an item of the line purchase order (POLI), in which each delivery includes: a quantity of the delivery, and a date of goods issue (PGI); a plurality of logistic services for the plurality of shipments including deliveries related to the POLI, one of the plurality of shipments, a multi-mode shipment, having a plurality of sequential logistic services; a plurality of deliveries related to the POLI, in which the following elements are determined for each of the deliveries: a quantity of goods received (GR), and a date GR; the processor for displaying the date PGI and the date GR for multimode sending having a plurality of modes of transport.
[0008]
The method of claim 7, wherein the processor receiving and storing logistics data relating to the POLI comprises receiving data from the logistics data providers selected from the group consisting of freight forwarders and customs brokers.
[0009]
The method of claim 7 or 8, wherein the plurality of sequential logistics services comprises: a first mode of transport operated by a first provider, the first provider carrying the multi-mode shipment from a first location to a second location ; and a second mode of transport operated by a second supplier different from the first provider, the second provider carrying the multi-mode shipment from a second location to a third location; and
[0010]
The method of any one of claims 7 to 9, wherein determining the date GR for each of the deliveries includes: the processor calculating the GR dates for deliveries related to the multi-mode send based on the plurality of deliveries related to POLI.
[0011]
The method of any one of claims 7 to 10, wherein the plurality of sequential logistic services comprises: a service provided by a forwarding company; a service provided by a courier company; and a service provided by a customs broker logistics.
[0012]
The method of any one of claims 7 to 11, wherein the plurality of sequential logistics services is selected from a group consisting of a service provided by a cargo handling company, a service provided by a courier company and a service provided by a customs broker logistics.

类似技术:

---

公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题

---

US8438119B2|2013-05-07|Foundation layer for services based enterprise software architecture

---

Morana et al.2014|Urban consolidation and logistics pooling

---

US20020095355A1|2002-07-18|Computer-implemented international trade system

---

US20070150387A1|2007-06-28|Consistent set of interfaces derived from a business object model

---

US20140012772A1|2014-01-09|Logistics sourcing improvements

---

Olson2011|Supply chain risk management: tools for analysis

---

FR3027708A1|2016-04-29|MANAGEMENT OF A SUPPLY CHAIN

---

Bansal2009|Technology scorecards: Aligning IT investments with business performance

---

McLaughlin et al.2003|Using information technology to improve downstream supply chain operations: a case study

---

US20160071055A1|2016-03-10|Freight services marketplace system and methods

---

Schmitz2010|The use of supply chains and supply chain management to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of GIS units

---

Xiong et al.2015|Intelligent technologies and systems of material management

---

Chudy et al.2011|Sales and distribution in SAP ERP: Practical guide

---

Payne et al.1991|Electronic Data Interchange |: Using Electronic Commerce to Enhance Defense Logistics

---

Turban et al.2015|Order Fulfillment Along the Supply Chain

---

Lehmacher2021|Digitizing and Automating Processes in Logistics

---

TW202139082A|2021-10-16|Computer -implemented system and method for electronically determining real -time registration

---

Vrijhoef2020|Extended roles of construction supply chain management for improved logistics and environmental performance

---

Rambaran2016|The effect of omni-distribution systems in managing demand order fulfilment frequencies: an apparel retailer.

---

Kamranpour et al.2019|Omnichannel Supply Chain Transformation for Third Party Logistics Providers

---

Mia2017|The relationship between the development of freight forwarding organization and export-import activity and it’s impact on the economics development of Bangladesh

---

Smith2020|Closing the gap between information and payment flows in a digital transformation

---

Mitra2020|Effectiveness of C-express Ltd. delivery system and customer satisfaction

---

Kurbel2013|ERP: Enterprise Resource Planning

---

Nyiendo et al.2019|Adoption of Extended RBV Model in Information Systems Technology, Processes and People's Value Chain in Postal: A Case of Postal Corporation of Kenya.

同族专利:

---

公开号 | 公开日

---

GB2546021A|2017-07-05|

---

GB201704162D0|2017-05-03|

---

US10515332B2|2019-12-24|

---

AR101988A1|2017-01-25|

---

US20170300851A1|2017-10-19|

---

WO2016064381A1|2016-04-28|

---

CA2961554A1|2016-04-28|

引用文献:

---

公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题

---

---

JP2001338165A|2000-05-29|2001-12-07|Nec Corp|Purchase system utilizing communication network and purchasing method|

---

AU2002351195A1|2001-11-28|2003-06-10|Isuppli Corporation|Supply chain network|

---

US20050119926A1|2003-12-01|2005-06-02|Leon Turetsky|Method and system for managing multi-national integrated trade and logistics and processes for efficient, timely, and compliant movement of goods across international borders|

---

US8050956B2|2004-03-08|2011-11-01|Sap Ag|Computer-readable medium, program product, and system for providing a schedule bar with event dates to monitor procurement of a product|

---

CN101111858A|2005-02-01|2008-01-23|株式会社日立制作所|Delivery date reply system, delivery date reply method, and delivery date reply program|

---

US7624024B2|2005-04-18|2009-11-24|United Parcel Service Of America, Inc.|Systems and methods for dynamically updating a dispatch plan|WO2017105343A1|2015-12-18|2017-06-22|Hitachi, Ltd.|Model determination devices and model determination methods|

---

WO2018052950A1|2016-09-13|2018-03-22|Proppant Express Solutions, Llc|Proppant tracking system|

---

CN108764790A|2018-05-21|2018-11-06|湖北迪天信息科技有限公司|A kind of automobile SC cooperating management platform|

---

CN113469630B|2021-09-02|2021-11-30|北京每日优鲜电子商务有限公司|Goods shelf placing method and device based on distribution information, electronic equipment and medium|

法律状态:
2016-08-12| TP| Transmission of property|Owner name: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., US Effective date: 20160708 |

---

2016-10-21| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 2 |

---

2017-10-26| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 3 |

---

2018-09-28| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 4 |

---

2019-10-30| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 5 |

---

2019-12-20| TP| Transmission of property|Owner name: LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORPORATION, US Effective date: 20191113 |

---

2021-07-09| ST| Notification of lapse|Effective date: 20210605 |

优先权:

---

申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题

---

PCT/US2014/061687|WO2016064381A1|2014-10-22|2014-10-22|Managing a supply chain|

---